YEAR-END FODDER
|
WHAT: 77th Annual Academy Awards
WHEN: Presented February 27, 2005
|
|
|
|
Having proven himself a poor prognosticator of the Academy Awards, our critic offers his conjecture with a caveat
Having done this for years now, I've come to realize that I may well be the world's worst Oscar predictor.
It's not that I incorrectly guess a vast majority of the categories every year -- half the Academy Awards are, for all intents and purposes, predetermined before the balloting even begins. Anyone can bat better than .500 when there's a "Titanic" or a "Return of the King" looming over Hollywood's annual self-congratulations ceremony. But then, I did bet against the third "Lord of the Rings" installment last year, so that should tell you something.
No matter how much history is read into the likes and dislikes of the fickle, usually populist and traditionalist Oscar voters, I have a tendency to misread their quirks or let my hopes cloud my judgment. No matter what my gut instincts tell me, I somehow manage to talk myself out of them -- and when I don't, my gut is often wrong.
This year's Oscar race is full of neck-and-neck contests, so I fully expect to look the fool on Monday morning. But what's the fun of watching the Academy Awards if you're not gazing in your crystal ball at the same time? So here goes nothing...
Best DIRECTOR
|
NOMINEES
Martin Scorsese for "The Aviator"
Clint Eastwood for "Million Dollar Baby"
Taylor Hackford for "Ray"
Alexander Payne for "Sideways"
Mike Leigh for "Vera Drake"
|
Predicted WINNER Clint Eastwood
Why: Scorsese is so overdue for a Best Director win that this category really could go either way -- and if the Academy wants to honor him, he's far more worthy for "The Aviator" than he was last year when nominated for "Gangs of New York." But if "Million Dollar Baby" does lose to "The Aviator" for Best Picture, this will become Eastwood's consolation prize.
Who SHOULD win: Scorsese's and Eastwood's work are equally worthy
|
Best ACTOR
|
NOMINEES
Don Cheadle for "Hotel Rwanda"
Johnny Depp for "Finding Neverland"
Leonardo DiCaprio for "The Aviator"
Clint Eastwood for "Million Dollar Baby"
Jamie Foxx for "Ray"
|
Predicted WINNER Jamie Foxx
Why: It's between Foxx and Cheadle, but the Academy always awards the gimmick performance -- either biopic mimicry or a character suffering some kind of ailment. Foxx killed two birds with one stone in a very good performance. Plus, he's already picked up the Screen Actors' Guild award and the Golden Globe. Nobody else stands a chance.
Who SHOULD win: Foxx (but the un-nominated Paul Giamatti got robbed)
|
Best ACTRESS
|
NOMINEES
Annette Bening for "Being Julia"
Catalina Sandino Moreno for "Maria Full of Grace"
Imelda Staunton for "Vera Drake"
Hilary Swank for "Million Dollar Baby"
Kate Winslet for "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind"
|
Predicted WINNER Hilary Swank
Why: Truly, this race is a toss-up between Swank and Bening, if only because the 1999 Best Actress race came down to the two of them and Swank won. Academy voters may take that into consideration and vote for Bening's highly praised but little-seen performance in "Being Julia," but Swank's turn as a white-trash female boxer has all the momentum, having also won at the SAG and Golden Globe.
Who SHOULD win: Swank
|
Best SUPPORTING ACTOR
|
NOMINEES
Alan Alda for "The Aviator"
Thomas Haden Church for "Sideways"
Jamie Foxx for "Collateral"
Morgan Freeman for "Million Dollar Baby"
Clive Owen for "Closer"
|
Predicted WINNER Morgan Freeman
Why: Well, I'm stumped, if you want to know the truth. Church has won several critical awards, and Owen won the Golden Globe and the BAFTA (Britain's Academy Award). But Freeman is almost as overdue for an Oscar as Scorsese, so the only thing I can say with any certainty is that it won't be Foxx (voters know he'll win Best Actor instead) or Alda. But then, the supporting categories are where the Academy often loves to dish out surprises...
Who SHOULD win: Freeman
|
Best SUPPORTING ACTRESS
|
NOMINEES
Cate Blanchett for "The Aviator"
Laura Linney for "Kinsey"
Virginia Madsen for "Sideways"
Sophie Okonedo for "Hotel Rwanda"
Natalie Portman for "Closer"
|
Predicted WINNER Cate Blanchett
Why: I'm not hedging my bets on this one. She captured the spirit of Katherine Hepburn too brilliantly for the others -- as good as they are -- to overcome.
Who SHOULD win: Blanchett
|
Best ANIMATED FEATURE
|
NOMINEES
"The Incredibles"
"Shark Tale"
"Shrek 2"
|
Predicted WINNER "The Incredibles"
Why: Well, it wouldn't surprise me if "Shrek 2" won, because the history of this young category points to box office being the determining factor, not quality. But "The Incredibles" is the only one of these three films that will stand the test of time, and I'm just going to have a little faith that the Academy voters are smart enough to realize that.
What SHOULD win: none of the above
|
Best FOREIGN FILM
|
NOMINEES
"As It Is In Heaven" (Sweden)
"The Chorus" (France)
"Downfall" (Germany)
"The Sea Inside" (Spain)
"Yesterday" (South Africa)
|
Predicted WINNER "The Chorus"
Why: It's the kind of quaint and innocuous movie designed specifically to melt Academy hearts. Call it the "Life Is Beautiful" award.
What SHOULD win: (no pick - haven't seen enough of them)
|
Best DOCUMENTARY
|
NOMINEES
"Born Into Brothels"
"The Story of Weeping Camel"
"Super Size Me"
"Tupac: Resurrection"
"Twist of Faith"
|
Predicted WINNER "Super Size Me"
Why: This is the film everyone knows and with the documentary becoming a profitable cinematic proposition in 2004, the popular film will win.
What SHOULD win: (no pick - haven't seen enough of them)
|
|